Home arrow Science arrow YET ANOTHER REASON BY IPCC AR5 PREDICTIONS/PROJECTIONS FAIL
YET ANOTHER REASON BY IPCC AR5 PREDICTIONS/PROJECTIONS FAIL

Posted 18 November 2013

“Use of circular arguments is standard operating procedures for the IPCC. For example, they assume a CO2 increase causes a temperature increase. They then create a model with that assumption and when the model output shows a temperature increase with a CO2 increase they claim it proves their assumption….They double down on this by combining an economic model that projects a CO2 increase with their climate model projection…. All their projections failed, even the lowest as, according to them, atmospheric CO2 continued to rise and global temperatures declined.”  Dr Timothy Ball debunks IPCC’s Assessment Report No. 5 (AR5).

 

Read it here

Last Updated ( Monday, 18 November 2013 )
 
< Prev   Next >
This website is dedicated to the memory of Professor August H. (Augie) Auer jr, a co-founder of the Coalition.