Home arrow Science
Science
NEW RESEARCH REVEALS OFFICIALLY ADJUSTED TEMPERATURE DATA ARE TOTALLY INCONSISTENT WITH RECORDS

Posted 12 July 2017

"The objective of this research was to test the hypothesis that Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NOAA, NASA and HADLEY are sufficiently credible estimates of global average temperatures, such that they can be relied upon for climate modelling and policy analysis purposes.... The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation in reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historial data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credibe U.S. and other temperature data."

 

Read it here 

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 11 July 2017 )
 
NO CRYSTAL BALL FOR LONG-TERM CLIMATE PREDICTIONS

Posted 10 July 2017

"No one I know disputes that the global climate has been warming over the past century and a half, that sea levels have indeed been rising, or that human activities, including carbon dioxide emissions, have and will continue to contribute 'some influence.' The big contentions have to do with determining just how much influence and why should we really care?  Repeatedly failed attempts to match actual observations with modelled theories demonstrate that the science is clearly not 'settled' at all."  Professor Larry Bell, posts at Newsmax.

Read it here 

Last Updated ( Monday, 10 July 2017 )
 
PARIS CLIMATE AGREEMENT SLAMMED AS "THE BIGGEST DECEPTION IN HISTORY"

Posted 9 July 2017

"To achieve the goal agreed in Paris of a maximum 2oC increase in global temperatures above pre-industrial levels has been estimated to have a global cost of $US17 trillion by 2040 (about 800 times more than was spent on all the Apollo missions to the moon) - and it would require carbon dioxide reductions about 100 times greater than those pledged in Paris. So, even if the man-made climate change problem were real, the actions specified by the Paris Agreement would solve nothing. And since the climate alarm is not based on sound science, no treaty based on the UNFCCC makes any sense." Canadians, Dr Timothy Ball, and Tom Harris, explain in detail why the Paris Agreement is "the biggest deception in history."

Read it here  

Last Updated ( Sunday, 09 July 2017 )
 
WHY PARIS CIMATE AGREEMENT IS UNSOUND SCIENTIFICALLY AND A BAD DEAL FOR AMERICA

Posted 8 July 2017

In a recent letter to his community, Massachusetts Institute of Technology President Rafael Reif criticised President Trump's decision to exit the Paris climate agreement, for ignoring "consensus" climate change science. In reply, a group of skeptic scientists have penned a two-part explanation of why Professor Reif is wrong, and why the ParIs agreement is a bad deal for America (and, by implication, any other first world nation unwise enough to sign up to it). The skeptics' reply is in two parts, and is a brilliant refutation of the alarmist propaganda.

Read Part I here 

Read Part II here 

Last Updated ( Sunday, 09 July 2017 )
 
More...
This website is dedicated to the memory of Professor August H. (Augie) Auer jr, a co-founder of the Coalition.